DeepMind Vs Google: The Inner Feud Between Two Tech Behemoths – Analytics India Magazine
Posted: December 18, 2019 at 9:45 pm
With the recent switch of DeepMinds co-founder Mustafa Suleyman to its sister concern Google, researchers are raising questions as to whether this unexpected move will cause a crack between the two companies. Suleyman was termed on leave by this London-based AI company for the last six months, but earlier this month, he confirmed his joining at Google through a Twitter post. In the post, Suleyman portrayed his excitement of joining the team at Google to work on opportunities and impacts of applied AI technologies.
Acquired by Googles parent company Alphabet in 2014, DeepMind was aimed at using machine intelligence to solve real-world problems, including healthcare and energy. While the co-founder Hassabis was running the core artificial intelligence research at DeepMind, Suleyman was in charge of developing Streams, a controversial health app, which gathered data from millions of NHS patients without their direct consent.
However, the relationship between Google and DeepMind has been fairly complicated since last year. After a brawl with Facebook in 2014, Google decided to acquire DeepMind for $600 million. However, it got separated from the tech giant in the year 2015, as a part of the Alphabets restructure, rising tension among Googles AI researchers.
Suleymans key project, Streams has created a considerable suspicion between the three companies Alphabet, DeepMind and Google. Although DeepMind promised to keep a privacy check on all 1.6 million Royal Free data, keeping it independent, its dealings with Google of taking over Streams, formed no legal foundation for this claim. Experts believed that such dealing is breaking DeepMinds promise of encryption. Nevertheless, in an interview, a DeepMind spokesperson mentioned how the company is still committed to its privacy statements and any dealing with Google is not going to affect the acquired data.
Previously Google has gone through several complexities like disenfranchising its employees, creating conflicts with the government, and ignoring its customers and clients. Google has also recently admitted its interest in serving China with the development of a censored search engine. These steps have in turn placed this company in an outrageous position, making it unpredictable and not-so-trustworthy for the mainstream media, privacy experts, giants of the industry, and even for the general population.
On the other side, Google has been wanting to capitalise on owning the highest concentration of AI talent, in the field of deep learning. But, DeepMinds contribution to Googles bottom line has been shocking. The company has been making a significant breakthrough with AI either in terms of diagnosing fatal diseases, engineering a bacteria to eat up plastic, or creating a computer program that plays the board game, called AlphaGo. However, the company turned out to be a big disaster for its investors considering the loss of $571 million last year with a constant debt to its parent company of approximately $1.4 billion. Such concerns added more complexities for DeepMind, which led Google to take over the control of the company contradicting the initial agreement, which allows DeepMind to operate independently.
Why did it come to this? The answer is a big gap in DeepMinds commercialisation research. According to industry experts, the company has been fixated with the development of general intelligence, however, the important aspect should have been working on short term projects which could potentially turn into products to solve real-world problems. Haitham Bou-Ammar, an executive at Cambridge-based AI startup Prowler.io, believed that the company requires a shift in focus, with strategies to make money with deep learning assets rather than creating an education lab.
With a single focus on deep-learning neural networks, DeepMinds AI approach hasnt been inclusive. The company should have rather focused on a multi-segment approach, which would have helped in creating evolutionary algorithms and decision making in a realistic environment. DeepMind has been putting all its eggs in one basket Deep Reinforcement Learning. Many also believe that that company should have been focusing on bridging gaps, instead, it has been dealing with issues related to their apparent independence.
DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis once declined Googles offer of leading their robotics unit. On the other hand, while the companys provided with its WaveNet software to Google for replicating a human voice, the companys leadership totally declined its association with its cloud platform. Such developments showcased a bumpy relationship between the two. Critics started to fear that the change in management will shift the focus from research to products, while the privacy experts are worried about Googles unsolicited access to NHS data.
From a distance, DeepMind looks to have made great progress with built-in software that can learn to perform tasks at a superhuman level, and other strides at the gaming industry, demonstrating the power of reinforcement learning and the extraordinary ability of its computer programs. However, the company has missed a huge aspect that says that DeepMinds program has always been so restricted with no ability to react to changes in the environment, lacking in flexibility.
Another aspect which is hardly been touched by the company is the reward function a signal that allows the software to measure its progress which is directly related to the success of virtual environments. The company has always been focused on developing reward function for AlphaGo, however, in the real world, the progress is never measured with single scores and is usually varied according to the sectors.
Therefore, for now, deep reinforcement learning can now only be used in trusted and controlled environments with few or no changes in the system that works fine for Go games, but real-world problems cannot rely upon the same. The company, therefore, has to focus on finding a large scale commercial application of this technology. So far, the parent company has invested roughly $2 billion on DeepMind with a decent financial return some of which came from applying deep reinforcement learning within Alphabet to reduce power costs for cooling Googles servers.
According to experts and researchers, although the technology works fine for Go, it might not be suitable for real-world challenging problems, that the company is aspiring to solve with AI. Cutting DeepMind some slack, we all have to agree that no scientific innovation turns profitable overnight. However, the company definitely needs to dig deeper and bring in the technology with other techniques to create more stable results.
Even if DeepMinds current strategy is turning out to be less fruitful, nobody can exclude the vision of the company. Although it is taking time to bridge the gap between deep reinforcement learning and artificial intelligence, its impossible to ignore that the company is held by hundreds of PHDs and is also running on good funding. In fact, the success of Go, Atari, and Starcraft has given a promising name to the company.
Meanwhile, the substantial cash burn along with the departure of a high-level executive has caused wreckage, placing the subsidiary in deep confusion. According to the policies, DeepMind is supposed to provide AI-related assets to various companies and products under Alphabet, however, on the other hand, Googles in-house AI management Google Brain already started occupying a similar role within the Alphabets ecosystem. This perplexity is deepening the problems for the company, pushing it to work in silos. In its present condition, DeepMind seems to be in a critical point, where the company is constantly investing in deep learning research and developing AI assets, but not living up to its potential.
comments
Read the original:
DeepMind Vs Google: The Inner Feud Between Two Tech Behemoths - Analytics India Magazine
- Examining the world through signals and systems - MIT News - February 10th, 2021
- Are we ready for bots with feelings? Life Hacks by Charles Assisi - Hindustan Times - December 12th, 2020
- What are proteins and why do they fold? - DW (English) - December 12th, 2020
- Are Computers That Win at Chess Smarter Than Geniuses? - Walter Bradley Center for Natural and Artificial Intelligence - December 4th, 2020
- An AI winter may be inevitable. What we should fear more: an AI ice age - ITProPortal - December 4th, 2020
- What the hell is reinforcement learning and how does it work? - The Next Web - November 2nd, 2020
- Investing in Artificial Intelligence (AI) - Everything You Need to Know - Securities.io - November 2nd, 2020
- How to Understand if AI is Swapping Civilization - Analytics Insight - October 3rd, 2020
- In the Know - UCI News - October 3rd, 2020
- Test your Python skills with these 10 projects - Best gaming pro - October 3rd, 2020
- Is Dystopian Future Inevitable with Unprecedented Advancements in AI? - Analytics Insight - June 26th, 2020
- Enterprise hits and misses - contactless payments on the rise, equality on the corporate agenda, and Zoom and Slack in review - Diginomica - June 8th, 2020
- AlphaGo - Top Documentary Films - June 5th, 2020
- AlphaGo (2017) - Rotten Tomatoes - June 5th, 2020
- Why the buzz around DeepMind is dissipating as it transitions from games to science - CNBC - June 5th, 2020
- The Hardware in Microsofts OpenAI Supercomputer Is Insane - ENGINEERING.com - June 5th, 2020
- This A.I. makes up gibberish words and definitions that sound astonishingly real - Digital Trends - May 17th, 2020
- QuickBooks is still the gold standard for small business accounting. Learn how it's done now. - The Next Web - April 19th, 2020
- The Turing Test is Dead. Long Live The Lovelace Test - Walter Bradley Center for Natural and Artificial Intelligence - April 8th, 2020
- The New ABCs: Artificial Intelligence, Blockchain And How Each Complements The Other - JD Supra - March 14th, 2020
- Enterprise AI Books to Read This Spring - DevOps.com - March 14th, 2020
- Chess grandmaster Gary Kasparov predicts AI will disrupt 96 percent of all jobs - The Next Web - February 25th, 2020
- The top 5 technologies that will change health care over the next decade - MarketWatch - February 25th, 2020
- How to overcome the limitations of AI - TechTarget - February 20th, 2020
- Levels And Limits Of AI - Forbes - February 20th, 2020
- From Deception to Attrition: AI and the Changing Face of Warfare - War on the Rocks - February 20th, 2020
- I think, therefore I am said the machine to the stunned humans - Innovation Excellence - February 10th, 2020
- AI on steroids: Much bigger neural nets to come with new hardware, say Bengio, Hinton, and LeCun - ZDNet - February 10th, 2020
- Why The Race For AI Dominance Is More Global Than You Think - Forbes - February 10th, 2020
- Why asking an AI to explain itself can make things worse - MIT Technology Review - January 29th, 2020
- AlphaZero beat humans at Chess and StarCraft, now it's working with quantum computers - The Next Web - January 18th, 2020
- What are neural-symbolic AI methods and why will they dominate 2020? - The Next Web - January 18th, 2020
- What is AlphaGo? - Definition from WhatIs.com - December 22nd, 2019
- AI has bested chess and Go, but it struggles to find a diamond in Minecraft - The Verge - December 18th, 2019
- AI is dangerous, but not for the reasons you think. - OUPblog - December 18th, 2019
- The Perils and Promise of Artificial Conscientiousness - WIRED - December 18th, 2019
- AlphaGo - Wikipedia - December 11th, 2019
- DeepMind co-founder moves to Google as the AI lab positions itself for the future - The Verge - December 11th, 2019
- Biggest scientific discoveries of the 2010s decade: photos - Business Insider - December 11th, 2019
- Facebooks Hanabi-playing AI achieves state-of-the-art results - VentureBeat - December 11th, 2019