Standard 4.1 Prevention Programs | Commission on Cancer Program Standards 2012 – Video
Posted: February 28, 2013 at 11:41 am
Standard 4.1 Prevention Programs | Commission on Cancer Program Standards 2012
Standard 4.1 requires cancer programs to provide the community with at least one cancer prevention program each year. The program must be targeted to a need identified in the community with the purpose to decrease the incidence of a specific cancer. This video series was created to assist you in understanding and interpreting the CoC Standards. The series includes an introduction video, two videos describing the Eligibility Requirements and an additional 26 individual videos describing select standards. Each video begins with the definition of the standard, describes the requirements for meeting the standard and concludes with best practice information. We hope that you and other members of your cancer committee find these videos useful as your cancer program works to implement and maintain compliance with the CoC Standards. If you or members of your team require additional education on these standards, be sure to visit the CoC Online Education Portal at eo2.commpartners.com to view more in depth educational webinars on the CoC Standards and survey process.
By:
AmCollegeofSurgeonsRead the original here:
Standard 4.1 Prevention Programs | Commission on Cancer Program Standards 2012 - Video
Standard 3.1 Patient Navigation Process | Commission on Cancer Program Standards 2012 – Video
Posted: at 11:41 am
Standard 3.1 Patient Navigation Process | Commission on Cancer Program Standards 2012
Patient Navigation Process, Standard 3.1, is a 2012 Standard with a phase-in date of January 1, 2015. All cancer programs will be required to demonstrate that they have the ability and resources to assist cancer patients, families, and caregivers in moving or "navigating" through the gaps and barriers to quality cancer care throughout their cancer journey. This video series was created to assist you in understanding and interpreting the CoC Standards. The series includes an introduction video, two videos describing the Eligibility Requirements and an additional 26 individual videos describing select standards. Each video begins with the definition of the standard, describes the requirements for meeting the standard and concludes with best practice information. We hope that you and other members of your cancer committee find these videos useful as your cancer program works to implement and maintain compliance with the CoC Standards. If you or members of your team require additional education on these standards, be sure to visit the CoC Online Education Portal at eo2.commpartners.com to view more in depth educational webinars on the CoC Standards and survey process.
By:
AmCollegeofSurgeonsContinued here:
Standard 3.1 Patient Navigation Process | Commission on Cancer Program Standards 2012 - Video
Full body Aerobics in Powerhouse gym – Video
Posted: at 3:55 am
Full body Aerobics in Powerhouse gym
Linden, NJ
By:
maximusp210Read this article:
Full body Aerobics in Powerhouse gym - Video
UMS PE Dance Aerobics Per. 1-6 – Video
Posted: at 3:55 am
UMS PE Dance Aerobics Per. 1-6
Final assessment
By:
Corey BrownSee the rest here:
UMS PE Dance Aerobics Per. 1-6 - Video
UMS PE Dance Aerobics Per. 2-3 – Video
Posted: at 3:55 am
UMS PE Dance Aerobics Per. 2-3
Final assessment
By:
Corey BrownHere is the original post:
UMS PE Dance Aerobics Per. 2-3 - Video
UMS PE Dance Aerobics Per. 2-5 – Video
Posted: at 3:55 am
UMS PE Dance Aerobics Per. 2-5
final assessment
By:
Corey BrownRead more:
UMS PE Dance Aerobics Per. 2-5 - Video
Heather’s Step Aerobics Combo #1 – Video
Posted: at 3:55 am
Heather #39;s Step Aerobics Combo #1
Basic 32 Count Step combo choreography with intermediate options. For educational purposes only. To see more fun, free workout videos, check out my website: http://www.fitnessworkoutsvideos.com Enjoy!
By:
Heather DavisRead the original post:
Heather's Step Aerobics Combo #1 - Video
Heather’s Step Aerobics Combo #3 – Video
Posted: at 3:55 am
Heather #39;s Step Aerobics Combo #3
For more free workout videos, visit: http://www.fitnessworkoutsvideos.com
By:
Heather DavisSee the rest here:
Heather's Step Aerobics Combo #3 - Video
Reading, writing, arithmetic, and aerobics — Evaluating the new ‘R’ in academic performance
Posted: at 3:55 am
Public release date: 28-Feb-2013 [ | E-mail | Share ]
Contact: Becky Lindeman journal.pediatrics@cchmc.org 513-636-7140 Elsevier Health Sciences
Cincinnati, OH, February 28, 2013 -- Although the long-term consequences of childhood obesity are well documented, some school districts have reduced physical education classes to devote more time to the 3 Rs in educationreading, writing, and arithmetic. However, there is new evidence that leaving out an important fourth Raerobicscould actually be counterproductive for increasing test scores. A new study scheduled for publication in The Journal of Pediatrics studied the associations between aerobic fitness, body mass index (BMI), and passing scores on standardized math and reading tests.
Dr. Robert R. Rauner and colleagues from Lincoln Public Schools and Creighton University in Nebraska analyzed scaled scores from standardized tests for math and reading, as well as PACER (15-20 meter timed shuttle run), BMI, and free/reduced lunch data from all students enrolled in elementary and middle schools in Lincoln, NE. They found that aerobically-fit children had a 2.4 times greater chance of passing math tests and a 2.2 times greater chance of passing reading tests compared with aerobically-unfit children. Among those receiving free/reduced lunch, the odds of passing the tests were still greater than those of students who were aerobically-unfit, but not as high as those not receiving free/reduced lunch. They also found that BMI, although an important indicator for overall general health, did not have a significant effect on academic success.
Although obesity is a concern for children, this study shows that aerobic fitness can have a greater effect on academic performance than weight. The authors found that both aerobic fitness and socioeconomic status have a similar impact on academic performance. Because aerobic fitness can be easier to improve than socioeconomic status, and it is easy to implement in a school setting, schools should think twice before taking minutes from physical education classes and recess. According to Dr. Rauner, "Schools sacrificing physical education and physical activity time in search of more seat time for math and reading instruction could potentially be pursuing a counterproductive approach."
###
AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.
Read the rest here:
Reading, writing, arithmetic, and aerobics -- Evaluating the new 'R' in academic performance
Excercise that uses water in the mouth through the oboe reed tube, a simulation of the air blowing. – Video
Posted: at 3:55 am
Excercise that uses water in the mouth through the oboe reed tube, a simulation of the air blowing.
oboe course corfu
By:
spyros kontosOriginally posted here:
Excercise that uses water in the mouth through the oboe reed tube, a simulation of the air blowing. - Video